Uploaded image for project: 'IGB'
  1. IGB
  2. IGBF-1219

Load Priority should be updated from preferences

        Details

        • Story Points:
          2
        • Sprint:
          B - Summer 2018

          Description

          Load Priority should be taken from user preferences. For default data providers, this attribute should be updated to reflect changes made by the user.

            Attachments

              Issue Links

              relates to

              Bug - A problem which impairs or prevents the functions of the product. IGBF-1225 Improve load priority settings for user-supplied data providers

              • Minor - Minor loss of function, or other problem where easy workaround is present.
              • Closed

              Bug - A problem which impairs or prevents the functions of the product. IGBF-1206 Duplicate QL sites appear in new versions of IGB with changed default QL sites

              • Major - Major loss of function.
              • Closed

              Bug - A problem which impairs or prevents the functions of the product. IGBF-1220 Ensure that IGB is loading sequences according to load priority

              • Major - Major loss of function.
              • Closed

                Activity

                Ascending order - Click to sort in descending order
                Hide
                Permalink
                ieclabau Ivory Blakley (Inactive) added a comment -

                See this branch on my fork:

                https://bitbucket.org/IvoryBlak/integrated-genome-browser/branch/IGBF-1219

                Show
                ieclabau Ivory Blakley (Inactive) added a comment - See this branch on my fork: https://bitbucket.org/IvoryBlak/integrated-genome-browser/branch/IGBF-1219
                Hide
                Permalink
                djoshi4 Deepti Joshi (Inactive) added a comment -

                The fix passes first level review.

                The code looks good and it does not break anything.

                Moving it to ready for pull request.

                Show
                djoshi4 Deepti Joshi (Inactive) added a comment - The fix passes first level review. The code looks good and it does not break anything. Moving it to ready for pull request.

                  People

                  • Assignee:
                    Unassigned
                    Reporter:
                    sneha Sneha Ramesh Watharkar (Inactive)
                  • Votes:
                    0 Vote for this issue
                    Watchers:
                    3 Start watching this issue

                    Dates

                    • Created:
                      Updated:
                      Resolved: